Adoption Brief
For a bet that worked — and is being adopted district-wide.
An Adoption Brief is what a team publishes when a six-week bet worked and the district is adopting the result. It is one page, posted to psd401.ai, written for two audiences: the next Peninsula team that needs to build on it, and other districts who might fork it.
§ I · The structureOne backbone, six fields
Every brief — Adoption, Decommission, Continuation — shares the same six-field backbone. Only the Decision field changes shape across the three patterns.
- Header strip — brief type, ID, cycle, team
- Hypothesis — what the team said they'd try, and what they expected
- What we did — the actual moves, with dates and surprises
- What we learned — bulleted findings, what confirmed, what didn't
- Decision — for Adoption Briefs, this is "Adopt district-wide" + rationale
- What others should know — the lift-and-shift instructions for the next team or district
§ II · A worked exampleWhat a published Adoption Brief looks like
AI-drafted family communications for new-student onboarding
Team · Communications Department
Hypothesis
If we equip Communications staff with a Logbook-built drafting assistant for new-family welcome letters, we expect to reduce drafting time per letter by half while improving readability and translation quality. Success means at least a 40% time reduction in measured drafting time across ten welcome letters, with no decrease in family satisfaction scores.
What we did
In Week 01 we built a drafting assistant on psd401.ai/aistudio that takes a student's enrollment context (grade, school, transition type) and produces a draft welcome letter in the family's home language. Communications staff revised every output before sending. In Weeks 02–05 we drafted 24 letters this way. In Week 06 we surveyed receiving families and the Communications team.
Surprise: Spanish and Korean letters needed less revision than English drafts, because the assistant defaults to plainer construction in non-English languages.
What we learned
- Average drafting time dropped from 28 minutes to 9 minutes per letter — a 68% reduction, well past our target.
- Family satisfaction (measured by 10-question survey, N=21) was statistically unchanged. Open-text responses praised the personal feel.
- Staff revision time per letter averaged 3 minutes, mostly to add school-specific detail the assistant could not know.
- The assistant struggled when families had multiple students transitioning simultaneously — a known gap we will solve in adoption.
Effective immediately. Communications will roll out to all seventeen schools in November. We will revisit the multi-student gap in Cycle 02 as a small bet.
What others should know
- The assistant lives at psd401.ai/aistudio as "Family Welcome Draft" — any district can fork the assistant template from our public library.
- The key design decision was requiring staff to revise every output before sending. Removing that step would degrade quality fast.
- Plain-construction defaults work better than literal translation in non-English contexts. Keep them.
- Don't measure satisfaction by survey rate — measure by open-text content. Our survey response rate was low (32%) but the content was substantive.
§ III · The fields, explainedWhat goes in each
§ IV · How the Logbook helpsFrom cycle work to published brief
The team does not draft the brief from a blank page. The Logbook reads the team's Google Chat Space — six weeks of check-ins, working notes, debrief threads — and produces a first draft against this template. The team revises, the team approves, the team publishes. First-draft to publishable usually takes one or two passes.